Human Desire to Fit In Essay Example For Students

Human Desire to Fit In Essay Two regular methods of taking care of a circumstance are either to do soaccording to ones own needs and wants with nospecific respect to others, or one can base a choice onhow it will be seen by others. Most by far of peoplefall on being stressed over what others are sayingand thinking. Both great and awful can emerge out of living this way,but it has appeared to stay consistent since forever. Peoplehave a characteristic want to have a place, and to fit in with a certaingroup. Regardless of what bunch an individual picks, thatindividual quite often is constrained penance a section ofthem self so as to appear to be increasingly a piece of things. Individuals in thisworld appear to require friendship and are frequently excessively powerless to independent. Therefore, they stand together in what ever bunch theyare most appropriate to. It is a focal point to a large number of the individuals who have stoppedto consider this reality. The possibility that individuals live agreeing tohow others will see at that point has been set up as the rule,not the special case. The genuine inquiry currently lies in the reasons forthis lifestyle. It was conjectured by C.S. Lewis that thisdesire to have a place and with fit in is a characteristic human trademark. He accepted that individuals have a natural drive to have a place, inthe same kind of way species replicate. It is conceivable that histheory of natural need is precise, and people are as awhole are week and frightened when they are confronted with isolation. The familiar aphorism there is security in larger groups is proper inthis point. Regularly in this world awful things happen becausepeople bunch up and submit unspeakable acts, at that point take cover inthe quantities of those included. The Annual Freaknik celebrationis the ideal model. A huge number of people swarm thestreets of Atlanta and plunder the city for an end of the week, all thewhile they show no regard for the laws or the occupants of thecity. This can be straightforwardly identified with the issue of individuals doingthings to be a piece of the gathering. In the event that these individuals were askedindividually why they did these horrendous things, for the mostpart they would react by saying every other person is doing it. This could be meant I am simply attempting to be a section ofthings. In this specific model those included sacrificeany feeling of ethics or childhood that they may have had. Everyone is doing it. This sentence has destroyed thousands oflives. It could be the most exceedingly terrible four word mix in theEnglish language. Individuals have been persuaded to start tranquilize use,drunk driving, bluff bouncing, and innumerable different unwiseactivities. The purpose for this is clear, the human necessityto fit in and to appear to be cool is regularly to solid to rival. Aperson could have the world and the entirety of its wealth, however with outsomeone to impart it to, that individual would be absolutely alone. Individuals need one another. This is a reality of the world, and it willnever change. This need is a characteristic want that is found wherever in each individual with not very many exemptions. It is genuine thattrouble can blend and horrendous things can happen on account of thesegroups, yet the focal points related out of sight the expenses. These gatherings that individuals structure between themselves frequently serve asshelter for the desolate, consequently it is normal forpeople to go out of sight way if important to have a place aparticular swarm. Therefore the assessment of others iscrucial part of life. .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 , .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .postImageUrl , .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .focused content region { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 , .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:hover , .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:visited , .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:active { border:0!important; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; mistiness: 1; change: darkness 250ms; webkit-change: murkiness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:active , .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:hover { haziness: 1; progress: obscurity 250ms; webkit-change: darkness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .focused content region { width: 100%; position: relative; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .ctaText { outskirt base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: intense; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; text-embellishment: underline; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; text style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636 .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; fringe: none; outskirt span: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: striking; line-stature: 26px; moz-fringe sweep: 3px; text-adjust: focus; text-adornment: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-tallness: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/straightforward arrow.png)no-rehash; position: total; right: 0; top: 0; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d 656ef381d6636 .focused content { show: table; tallness: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .u64db4046ff4bba5eb0d656ef381d6636:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: Recycling Essayand fuck youyou are a lot of profiteering prostitutes and ought to be bludgoned to death with a wet noodle!thank you and go to hell†¦.pigfucker!!!

Information Communication Technology Project Essays -

Data Communication Technology Project Understudy Name: Establishment: Date: Data Communication Technology Project Presentation About 10 years back, the grounds offices were progressed as far as framework and administration, this was viewed as a significant segment when most understudies were hoping to apply for a course at a specific college. The degree of basic advancement assumed an incredible job in the picking of grounds and thus, the grounds worked day and night with an endeavor at being better than their partner at every ounce of progress ( Mansfi eld Antonakos, 2010 ) . This made most grounds grow significantly and get major for drawing in more understudies and by and large improving the instructive reason for the understudy body. Today, the infrastructural improvement isn't considered at all for as a matter of course they ought to be stepped up enough for this age. The most saw today is the mechanical progression of any foundation, as far as their IT hardware, accessibility of web or intranet and different headways identified with the innovative division. In the current innovative age, it is clumsy for a higher learning organization like a grounds and college to need best in class innovation that is found in pretty much every other establishment (Andrews, 2016) . The requirement for an IT anticipate in the foundation is for the most part since today everything is made simpler gratitude to mechanical headway. The underlying phase of school application that is done online whereby one fills it and upon affirmation, one knows it online without setting a foot in that grounds until being acknowledged indeed, what is left is messaging oneself to the school with one's gear in light of the fact that doubtlessly everything else is on the web. It is, in this manner, a center need for every grounds to be as innovatively progressed as workable for simplicity of everything in the school. Stage 1 This stage delineates all the issues that the establishment of IT offices will fathom. Since it is one major school, the systems are prescribed to be as not many as feasible for simplicity of synchronization. In any case, there ought not be one system simply because of security purposes. A system can be undermined or put under reconnaissance or just for the most part hacked. The snappiest answer for this is to get into the other existing system there and introduce enormous firewalls on the undermined system to bolt out all cases or in the most dire outcome imaginable, the other system is tapped in and subterranean insect touchy data from the undermined organize is erased, on account of the accessibility of more than one system. Another basic explanation behind the instatement of this venture, the grounds the board framework will work online whereby every understudy will have their own record where through it they will get enrolment gives that they need the address or have inquiries regarding and effectively resolve them there. Furthermore, for the proceeding with understudies, they will get plans, test materials and even download address material. This is profoundly advantageous considering about 10 years prior if the understudies needed such administrations; they needed to go to the workplaces or organization square to sort these issues ( Doraiswa my, Shiv, 2012) . This was very wild considering the understudies are around 3,000 implying that the organization squares were in every case brimming with understudies with various requirements that must be settled in one of the workplaces or a notification load up to show the plans and assessment refreshes. The presentation of the current IT anticipate will annihilate these chaotic long stretches of holding up in line or deferring plans because of jam in the workplaces. Additionally, if the understudies need to air an issue to the school the board, there will be the formation of an entryway to manage that online by posting and the organization gets it and makes important modifications. Another issue that the IT presentation will tackle is lessening the remaining burden for the teachers to amplify their yield. The instructors will have the option to post their talks on the web and even show on the web or utilize chronicles for educative purposes subsequently having more opportunity to train all the more inevitably covering more gratitude to the IT anticipate. Likewise, if understudies need address materials, they may simply download them from the

Impact of Data Warehousing and OLAP Models on Management Accounting Thesis

Effect of Data Warehousing and OLAP Models on Management Accounting - Thesis Example The utilization of OLAP and BI devices empower the administration bookkeepers to secure exact data pretty much all offices. With these instruments, an administration bookkeeper can draw thoughts from the past happenings of the association even absent a lot of information about the outside variables that would prompt breakdown of the association. Inferable from these realities, this examination work has directed an inside and out investigation of the effect of OLAP and information warehousing on the board bookkeeping. This examination work has utilized the quantitative strategy for information assortment to get supposition from 25 members from different associations. The poll has been isolated into six segments. The examination model has been founded on these inquiries and chosen control factors. Factual examinations in SPSS have been performed on the quantitative information gathered to distinguish the impact of the autonomous and control factors on the fundamental ward variable. Exp ressive insights, connection investigation and relapse examination have been led to contemplate the connection between the factors. In view of the investigations it has been discovered that the components like commonality of the association about OLAP, mastery level and similarity of records office staff, the OLAP 3D shape structure, accessibility of gifted work force and the documentation of BRS have significant impact on the decision and execution of OLAP. Furthermore, the usage of OLAP is found to have significant effect on the board bookkeeping methods prompting improved dynamic business strategies.... o 14 2 Identification of research issue 15 3 Main research question and Hypotheses 17 4 Aim and Objectives of the Research 18 5 Methodology of research 18 6 Structure of the exploration 20 Chapter 2 †Literature Review 21-36 2.1. The Traditional Accountant 21 2.2. Difficulties looked by The Traditional Accountant 22 2.3. Progress of job 23 2.4. The Data Marts 24 2.5. Prologue to OLAP 25 2.6. OLAP models 26 2.6.1. Information examination in OLAP 26 2.6.2. OLAP segments 26 2.7. The job of OLAP 30 2.8. Mapping the BI 30 2.9. Database Design 32 2.10. Distribution center Management 33 2.11. Difficulties and ramifications of BI instruments 35 2.12. Section outline 36 Chapter 3 - Theory and Hypotheses 37-51 3.1. Establishment of the investigation 37 3.2. Recognition of Organizations 37 3.3. Arranging of associations for OLAP 41 3.4. Changes in different offices and OLAP 43 3.5. Similarity of the board bookkeepers with OLAP 45 3.6. Commitment of OLAP to business technique 47 3.7. Commitm ent of OLAP to bookkeeping 50 3.8. Part outline 51 Chapter 4 †Research Framework 52-87 4.1. Research strategies 52 4.1.1. Review Research techniques 54 4.1.2. Subjective review technique 54 4.1.3. Quantitative study strategy 56 4.2. Test choice 58 4.3. Information Collection 59 4.4. The Research Model 64 4.4.1. ID of factors 65 4.4.2. Subordinate variable 65 4.4.3. Free factors 65 4.4.4. Control factors 68 4.5. Research model with factors 70 4.6. Indicative tests and issues 72 4.6.1. Spellbinding Statistics 73 4.6.2. Inferential Statistics 74 4.7. Outline of SPSS 76 4.7.1. Calculations upheld in SPSS 78 4.7.2. SPSS displaying 78 4.8. Measurable investigations in SPSS 79 4.8.1. Information groundwork for SPSS examination 79 4.8.2. Bivariate and Multivariate Analyses 80 4.8.3. Connection in SPSS 83 4.8.4. Relapse

Nuclear Arms Race free essay sample

Structure Objectives Introduction Background to the Nuclear Arms Race 9. 2. 1 9. 2. 2 9. 2. 3 The Beginning : Birth of the Nuclear Arms Race The Manhatten Project Rationale for the Arms Race in the Post War Period The Nuclear Arms Race : How it is not quite the same as all the Previous Arms Races in History 9. 3. 1 9. 3. 2. 9. 3. 3. The Trinity Test Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings New York Times and the Trinity Test Different Phases of the Nuclear Arms Race in the Post-War Period 9. 4. 1 9. 4. 2 9. 4. 3 9. 4. 4 9. 4. 5 9. 4. 6 9. 4. 7 9. 4. 8 Fear of the Soviets and Communism 945 to 1953 : Period of US Monopoly 1957 to 1968 : Period of Missile Crisis and the ICBM Race 1968 to late 1970s : Period of MIRV and ICBM Race 1981 : Reagans Strategic Modernization Plan 1983 : Militarization of Space-Reagans Star War Program 1984-1991 : Nuclear Arms Race in the Gorbachev Era and the most recent long stretches of crumbling Soviet Union. 1991 to 1997 : Nuclear Arms Race after the Collapse of Sov iet Union Nuclear Arms Race in the Third World and South Asia 9. 5. 1 9. 5. 2 95. 3 9. 5. 4 Acquisition of Nuclear Capability by China and beginning of Arms Race in South Asia India, Pakistan and the Nuclear Arms Race Domino Theory in South Asia General Complexion of Arms Race in South Asia Let Us Sum Up Key Words Some Useful Books Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 9. We will compose a custom exposition test on Atomic Arms Race or then again any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page 0 OBJECTIVES This unit manages Arms Race and the Nuclear Threat in the current day world. Subsequent to contemplating this unit, you will be in a situation to: comprehend the foundation to the atomic weapons contest; clarify how the atomic weapons contest is not quite the same as all the past arms races; talk about the various periods of the atomic weapons contest in the post-war period; and emarnine the atomic weapons contest in the Third World and particularly in South Asia. . 1 INTRODUCTION This unit on Arms Race and Nuclear Threat is a piece of Block 3 which manages what is known as the Cold War Period; I. e. , after the Second World War and the rise of what is named as Superpower Dominance. In Unit World War 11: Causes and Consequences (Emergence of Super Powers) you have found out about how the USA and the USSR rose as Superpowers in global governmental issues after the finish of the Second World War. In Unit 7 : Cold War: Meaning, Patterns and Dimensions, you have figured out how the breakdown of Germany and its partners in 1945 prompted the rise of what has been named as Cold War between the-two principle forces of the post-1945 universal request * I. e. USA and USSR. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) which was managed in Unit 8 of this square was a result of the virus war power alliance legislative issues. One thing regular to the post-1945 worldwide request just as the pre-1945 world was the weapons contest. When learning about World War I and 11, you would have doubtlessly found out about the weapons contest which was both quantitative and subjective in character. It would likewise have been seen that the weapons contest in its subjective measurement in both the universal wars was itself probably the best reason for the two wars. From the development of explosive by Sir Alfred Nobel of the Novel Industries in the First World War time frame, to the creation of rockets by Germany in the Second World War, it is the quest for a definitive weapon which could win all wars that comprised the best push for the weapons contest. In this franticness researchers, countries, individuals, warriors, lawmakers all fell prey and wound up just murdering more prominent and more noteworthy number of regular citizens. In the current unit, we will focus on the weapons contest in the post-1945 worldwide request. As has been expressed previously, this mission for a subjectively progressively dangerous weapon was the best rousing component in carrying the world a bit nearer to war, be it the First or the Second World War. The key distinction in the weapons contest before 1945 (I. e. in the interwar period) and after 1945 was the atomic measurement. Before 1945, all the arms races in mankind's history never stood up to what is presently prevalently known as the Nuclear Threat. After 1945, the weapons contest that humankind got occupied with turned into the best living danger to life itself as known on this planet. The distinction lies in a single subjective advance in the weapons contest, and that progression was the production of the Atomic or Nuclear bomb in 1945. Accordingly, from 1945 the weapons contest we talk about in this Unit, remained not, at this point regular however obtained an atomic character and from that point till today, man is occupied with a weapons contest that puts the two gatherings who participate in it, under an interminable Nuclear Threat. 9. B ACKGROUNDTOTHENUCLEARARMSRACE 9. 2. 1 The Beginning : Birth of the Nuclear Arms Race The atomic weapons contest between the superpowers started at first in the pre-second world war period between the Germans and the Allied Powers. It was with regards to this contention preceding the Second World War that in 1938, at the Kaiser William Institute in Germany, Otto Hann and Dr. Fritz Steersman initially split the particle. Lise Meitner and Otto Hann later pronounced this fruitful parting of the iota adding up to an atomic splitting. It involved incident that at this crossroads ever, the best personalities taking a shot at the nuclear issue were Jews and that as well, German. Hitlers fast enemy of Semitism during the period sent the greater part of these extraordinary personalities in Germany racing to the USA where they were invited. These escaping researchers educated the American military who were intently checking occasions in Europe. There was across the board worry that Germany may be the first to create the atomic bomb as the information on parting the particle was at that point accessible to it. Albert Einstein excessively was one of the displaced people and he knew completely the criticalness of this disclosure, for it was he who originally opened the mystery intensity of the particle to the cutting edge world. He cautioned the President of the United States about it. 9. 2. 2 The Manhatten Project T he Americans under President Roosevelt were completely mindful of the worldwide ramifications thus started the race to construct the bomb first. Roosevelt charged what was the top mystery Man Hatten Project, the greatest logical exertion at any point made costing 2 billion dollars under Maj. Gen. Leslie Groves to build the nuclear bomb in a record time. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, Herbert York, Edward Teller, Hans Beth and a large group of other logical illuminating presences were engaged with the creation of the initial three atomic bombs. The fascinating part of this bomb development was that however the underlying adversary was Germany, gradually the genuine foe for whom the bomb was built ended up being the Soviet Union. Indeed, Gen. Leslie Groves expressed that he had no fantasies that Soviets were the genuine foe. - This reality is basic to a comprehension of the post 1945 world. Weapons contest and Nuclear Threat 1 Cold War Period 9. 2. 3 Rationale for the Arms Race in the Post War Period Germany, the principal country with whom the US occupied with the N-Arms race gave up in May 1945 and all its atomic offices were devastated, along these lines finishing the primary period of an early atomic weapons contest. In spite of this the weapons contest needed to proceed once the weapons had been manufactured. Another adversary over the skyline was found Communist Soviet Union. The dread of socialism was ideologically energizing the incensed pace of the A-Bomb development. In that sense the rising U. S. ilitary-modern complex was not off-base. Socialist USSR was certainly the greatest force defying USA and its western partners once Germany crumbled. The world was unquestionably getting separated into two camps, the industrialist and the communist and Europe including Germany was its first casualties. The Allies couldn't take care of business. Something must be disco vered, another extreme weapon which could stop and potentially wreck the walk of socialism. That something planned at first for fundamentalist Germany and utilized for experimentation in Japan was to be presumably utilized later against the Socialist Soviet association. This was the basic ideological battle cry in the American foundation and the inconspicuous purpose behind proceeding with the weapons contest into the post-Second World War world period. The revelation of the split particle offered certainty to the United States that it could battle the virus war or iron-shade that Winston Churchill said had slid over Europe. It meant that the new war after 1945 would be battled against the USSR. Check Your Progress 1 Note : I) Use the space offered beneath for your responses. ii) C hell your answer with the model answers given toward the finish of the unit. 1) Analyze the foundation to the atomic weapons contest. 2) What are the method of reasoning for the weapons contest in the post-war period? s 9. 3 THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE : HOW IT IS DIFFERENT FROM ALL PREVIOUS ARMS RACES IN HISTORY 9. 3. 1 The Ikinity Test Of the three bombs developed, the first was tried on July 16, 1945 at Alamagordo, New Mexico. It is known as the Trinity Test. The fruitful Trinity Test proclaimed the introduction of the Nuclear-Bomb in mankind's history and the beginning of the atomic age. Neils Bohr, the well known Danish Physicist, prophetically watched the insetting weapons contest and its subjective distinction. In a letter to Resident Roosevelt on 3 July 1944 he referenced that a weapon of unmatched force was being made which would totally change every single future state of fighting. A few researchers envisioning the weapons contest between the US and the USSR encouraged the American Government to impart the atomic insider facts to Soviet Union and in this way forestall a weapons contest. In any case, clearly the researchers were excessively guileless of the round of governmental issues just as the power of universal legislative issues. Such guidance was rarely heard, and the race was proceeded in the expectation of triumph. To the military urgently searching for an approach to manage the Germans, the Japanese qnd at last the Soviets, the Trinity Test h

Shakespeare’s an Example of the Topic History Essays by

Shakespeare’s The two characters Richard, Duke of York and Henry, Earl of Richmond both get ready for the fight to come by addressing their troopers, painting a direct opposite perspective on each other. Richmonds discourse to his officers conjures privileged retribution for the sake of friends and family and of his nation. In Act 5 and scene 3, the peruser is given Richmonds perspective. Prior to giving a discourse to his troopers, Richmond had imagined that he was visited by his killed family members. His dead family members urged him to prevail upon this fight Richard who had killed them. This fantasy message turns into the fuel that lights Richmonds drive to overcome Richard and his men. Need paper test on Shakespeares subject? We will compose a custom paper test explicitly for you Continue Richmonds manner of speaking, full true and assurance for his troopers, crawls into the opening of his discourse in line 237 more than I have stated, adoring comrades. (p.140) Instead of seeing his fighters in a non-positioned way, Richmond unites them with him in fraternity thus his decision of word kinsmen. This implies his soldiers and him are end this together for hell's sake. Richmond bond is as one as refined men in line 245. Before giving his fighters the last motivational speech, Richmond helps them the sort to remember individual Richard is. His discourse hues Richard as a ridiculous dictator and murder. (line 246), a double crosser and a killer in line 255. Richmond is progressively worried about good retribution as a demonstration of respect to his nation, to his compatriots and to God. He utilizes influence as his blade slicing through the unforgiving truth of what has being going on. For example, in line 247 while depicting Richard as not a piece of comrades, however as individual who devastates men. By reprimanding to call Richard by name other than one or swindler or despot, Rchmond convinces the officers a virus image of a foe; Richard isn't one of them as showed in these lines one hath ever been Gods adversary/at that point on the off chance that you battle against Gods enemy,(252-254 ). The Duke of York proceeds with this strategy all through his discourse, wandering aimlessly his words to develop the disdain that he has about his adversary onto his warriors. He does this by reminding each fighter that he has an obligation for the sake of God and to think about every one of their own lives if the fight isn't one. As depicted inside lines: God will in equity ward you as his fighters On the off chance that you do perspire to put a dictator down, You rest in harmony, the dictator being killed; In the event that you do battle against your countrys enemies, Your countrys fat will pay your torments the recruit On the off chance that you do battle in shield of your spouses, Your spouses will invite home the heros; In the event that you do liberate your kids from the blade, Your childrens kids stops it in your age, At that point, for the sake of God and every one of these rights. (254-263) Now Richmond breaks the security and isolates this aim to urge each trooper to consider their spouses, youngsters, nation and God while out on the front line. He has become a pioneer their pioneer. In the event that they win this fight in do as such in ommitment and in respect they will be cherished by their families, their posterity will profit and as showed in line 256 , the officers will find a sense of contentment knowing Richard is not, at this point live to take from them. In contrast to Richmond, who has all the earmarks of being progressively true and respectable in what his identity is and what his battling, King Richard, Duke of Gloucester, who has all the earmarks of being increasingly legitimate and direct. He es directly into his discourse with no respects to his men. There is no glow however fretfulness with kicking this fight off and done. He gives them a grimy and appalling image of Richmond and his officers. The initial lines quickly gives the peruser this What will I say more than I induced/Remember whom you are to adapt withal. (p.143) Hearing this discourse for all to hear, the peruser accepts that King Richard talks quickly with no scurry or misuse of words. He rehashes again and again to his troopers the kind of individuals they will fight. In contrast to Richmond, who is essentially out to get King Richard, King Richard irregularities Richmond with fighters as one. He calls them drifters, rapscallions, wanderers (Shakespeare line 316), starving poor people (Shakespeare 329). The Duke of Gloucester considers them to be pariahs, a whole of Bretons and base toady laborers, (Shakespeare 317). Shakespeare gives King Richard horrendous symbolism by having utilizing inauspicious words like regurgitation , chilly, poor not exclusively to depict the nemy however an impression of King Richard himself as uncompassionate, coldblooded, heartless, and horrid. The symbolism of Richards foes paints his adversaries as abhorrent and nauseating like spoiled villains in a sewer when contrasted with in this line For need of means, poor rodents, had hanged themselves (Shakespeare 331). As he babbles about Richmond and his troopers, Richards strategy that he utilizes in his discourse is mockery which is dispersed all through his discourse. He does this to sincerely fuel his soldiers to win this fight. He demands this in hese lines: On the off chance that we be vanquished, let men overcome us, Furthermore, not these knave Bretons, whom our dads Have in their own property, beaten, bounced and pounded, Furthermore, in record left them the beneficiaries of disgrace (332-335) Lord Richard doesn't need his men to convey this disgrace so he pushes on letting them know whether they lose Richmond and his men will make the most of their territories and lay down with their lives. (p.143) However, he offers this in a conversation starter structure Shall these make the most of our properties?/Lie with our spouses? Violate our little girls? (Shakespeare 336). Once more, in his discourse, King Richard interfaces with his fighters. While one paints the different as rubbish and the different as a despot, Both Richmond and King Richard detest each other in various manners for various reasons. The two talks mirror the sort of men they are and the sort of warriors they have by the portrayal they each paint of each other as demonstrated before with a few models. Shakespeare intentionally made the two characters direct opposite of one another that even the names are inverse. Richmond is delicate and solid and Richard is cold and inhumane. Shakespeare gives the peruser similitudes and metaphors in the two mens addresses to uncover the characters emotions around each other. For instance he utilizes this gadget in Richmonds discourse in these line The petitions of blessed holy people and wronged spirits/Like high-raised defenses, remain before our faces, (Shakespeare lines 241-242). Shakespeare utilizes embodiment in King Richards discourse, however he doesn't feature it. Whom their o ercloyed nation heaves forward/to edgy undertakings and guaranteed destruction(Shakespeare 318-319). These explanatory gadgets advance and bolster the characters persona. Ruler Richards character spills his brutal sentiments towards Richmond, yet in the discourse, Shakespeare slides incongruity in the speech. Lers whip these strays oer the oceans once more. (Shakespeare line 327) King Richard calls Richmond and his officers strays however his manner of speaking in this line and all through the discourse is that of a maverick. Shakespeare flips it around by having King Richard talk in a reckless and quick pace way. Shakespeare needs the peruser to realize it is King Richard who is a stray. Shakespeare doesnt do this with Richmond. He gives a pioneer type figure, in which Richmond talks honorable, quiet and with conviction. The two unparallel discourses furnishes with hinting of what is going to come and who may win. The peruser figures it will be Richmond and his men dependent on t Richmonds discourse and how her presents himself. Richmond has a reason to satisfy; King Richard needs a fight to evacuate Richmond off the beaten path. The King doesnt express that side of him. He just tends to the repercussions of losing a fight. He subtly gives his warriors dread as covered up in these lines You dozing safe, they bring to you agitation/You having lands, and favored with beauteous spouses/They would limit the one, distain the other( Shakespeare 320-322). He needs them to stress over what might occur in the event that they overcome their lives. He takes care of his troopers dread. Incidentally, He doesn't give support or respectability regardless of him being the King of Gloucester. Shakespeare shows the peruser this. Shakespeare aims with these talks are to draw the polar personas of the two men. Works Cited Bevington, David. Ed. Shakespeares Richard II. New York: Bantam Book and Scott, Foresman and Company, 1980. Bevington, David. Ed. Shakespeares Richard III. New York: Bantam Book and Scott, Foresman and Company, 1980.

the two sides of CPW

the two sides of CPW It so happened that my younger sister got accepted into the Class of 2023 this year. She also happens to be quite a good writer, so we decided to do a dual blog post about our CPW experiences hers as an excited prefrosh, and mine as a jaded East Campus CPW chair. The Build-Up [Ankita] I committed to MIT a couple of weeks ago, so my main goal at CPW was to figure out housing. I thought it would be easy, but seeing the huge variety of events at each dorm was completely overwhelming, so I started creating my schedule pretty much the moment this year’s events leaked :’) Like a true #13, I spent hours creating and revising my schedule, and though I definitely didn’t need to invest so much time and energy in it, I don’t rEaLly regret itâ€"it helped hype me up for everything to come. Thanks to the phenomenon known as the Prefrosh Group Chatâ„¢, I already had a group of friends to plan with. We were pretty meticulous with our scheduling (see: color-coded spreadsheets) and even had a group video call to figure out which events we all had in common (lol yeah we went OFF)Here’s a screenshot of my spreadsheet. I went to 18/33 of the events I put on my schedule sonot bad, I guess? The Build-Up [Nisha] I got elected as one of the three CPW Chairs of East Campus a while back (maybe in January, but I honestly couldnt tell you the exact date because this year has been a blur). Our job is to basically coordinate all of the events that East Campus runs for the prefrosh, which probably sounds a lot easier than it is (and honestly, I thought it would be easier than it was). This involves bugging people to run events, buying them all the stuff they need to run the events, and making sure that things actually happen. Our spreadsheets were notably less exciting than Ankitas, and most of them looked something like this. In the week or so leading up to the actual event, we also had to go on a few shopping trips, including one to a sketchy warehouse where we picked up 65 cases of Yerba Mate (this is the second East Campus event theyve sponsored!) and a Costco trip that maxed out a credit card limit. THE YERB WAREHOUSE document.createElement('video'); https://mitadmissions.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/video-1556001363.mp4 Thursday [Ankita] I arrived at CPW around 10:30 and attended orientation/put my luggage in Burton-Conner, the dorm at which I was staying for the weekend, before RUNNING to the Course 15 Luncheon. I then met up with some friends and briefly went to a couple more housing events as well as Where Will I Live?, the International Dinner at Number 6, and the Admitted Student Welcome. After, I walked around with my orientation group for a bit and then went to Baker Horizons (which wasinteresting) and then Midnight Waffles at Maseeh. Honestly, Day 1 was a bit underwhelming. It might’ve been because I allotted 45 minutes to an hour for certain events that I ended up not spending more than ten minutes at. Food events, quite reasonably, are generally more about socializing than the food itself (I admit to eating chocolate-dipped Oreos alone in a corner once) but it was hard to spend much time with as many people as I’d hoped when everyone is running off to different events. Highlights: Face masks with the squad at 1 am in the Student Center International Dinner at Number 6 (great people and great foodâ€"I wish all the food events I attended were as fun as this) Frilled Cheese With F-Entry Thursday [Nisha] I woke up bright and early along with a fellow CPW chair to start up the grills. Thankfully, it was a beautiful morning that boded well for the rest of the CPW weather theres a longstanding joke that the MIT weather machine is always broken for CPW. Why were we starting up the grills at 8 in the morning? East Campus has a tradition of grilling almost nonstop throughout the ~72 hours that CPW spans. If prefrosh walk by, we always want to have something to offer them more specifically, a delicious Costco burger with all the condiments possible and melted cheese. The East Campus courtyard is a great place to come hang out and chill and have a burger, and we try to wake as many people up in the mornings so that the early rising prefrosh will always have somebody to hang out with at EC. I spent the morning hanging around and making sure things were all set up to run smoothly. At some point, I realized that we had forgotten to buy cheese :P which prompted one of not two, but  three  Costco trips that we took over the span of 3 days. Other than that, the day only had one major thing go wrong, and it was the strangely popular set a cake on fire event. Apparently to set a cake on fire, you need a LOT of vanilla extract, and the event runner had only requested a single bottle :P after running around distressed for a while (and setting some of the cakes on fire in the oven), we just hoped that a single bottle of extract would work and went for it anyways (it didnt, but it was fine). Fun fact, though: vanilla extract is 70-proof??? All in all, though, the day went pretty well. I collapsed in bed at midnight (super early for me) completely exhausted and not ready to do it all again in the morning, but such is the life of a CPW chair. Highlights: The bee cupcakes event was adorable and the cupcakes were delicious The sweet taste of a Costco veggie burger filling my mouth after so, so long Going to sleep Friday [Ankita] ankita w/ MIT mirchi Friday was where things started to pick up. I had a Wholesome Breakfast of barbeque chips before going to BC Field Day and then Bolly and Boba with Mirchi, MIT’s amazing Bollywood fusion dance team. After picking up some swag at the Academic Expo, I hung out in McCormick with some friends until Taste of Cambridge (long live Insomnia Cookies) and Charades Against Humanity in Burton-Conner, which was exactly what it sounds like and definitely one of my favorite events. academic expo My friend group hung out at Taste of New for a bit before migrating to S’mores at Maseeh. We didn’t really participate in the eventâ€"we just sat in a giant circle talkingâ€"but it was still one of my favorite experiences of CPW. Old Town Road played twicebless maseeh courtyard I spent the rest of the night exploring campus, hanging out with friends, and getting food (shoutout to the Clover on Mass Ave for being open 24 hours a day) Highlights: Charades Against Humanity Chilling at Maseeh Seeing Nisha in her Blogger shirt uwu Friday [Nisha] Another day of CPW, another alarm set at 7:45 am. I dragged myself out of bed to light the grills, but was met with a slightly concerning issue around 8:45 am: our 9 am event runner was nowhere to be seen, and prefrosh were already starting to gather in surprisingly large groups. It turns out that said event runner had stayed up till 5 am doing her taxes, and was rightfully too tired to run her event. What ended up happening was an impromptu display of East Campus spirit when everything is on fire (figuratively, sometimes literally), everybody pitches in to help. We had the prefrosh help us make the batter for the promised crepes and pancakes, and also had them help us make the aforementioned breakfast foods in the kitchen. We somehow managed to meet the demands of the enormous group of prefrosh who had gathered for crepes and pancakes with batter (so much batter) to spare. Shoutout to that one frosh who was really good at making crepes. We also had a brunch for parents and gave tours afterwards, and man, am I ever tired of giving tours. I must have given four or five parent tours during CPW, and this doesnt include the tours I gave the prefrosh. Parent tours are a little hard because we have to censor ourselves to some extent, and the questions that they ask can sometimes be really obvious and frustrating. Like, yes, this dorm is co-ed, just like pretty much all the dorms at MIT??? :P Other than that, I pretty much just ran around micromanaging the whole day. I managed to rack up around ~15000 steps just from being on my feet the whole day, which was impressive. Highlights: Catching a flying wad of whipped cream in my mouth not once, but twice, to the applause of many impressed prefrosh (lol) Wearing my stupid blogger shirt with my face on it   Taking a quick trip with Jack Florey Saturday [Ankita] An hour of sleep later, I was speed walking to Anime Karaoke. It ended late, so I went directly to the Activities Midway, which was really fun and helpful; I spent the full two hours there visiting the booths and watching all the performances. the taekwondo team at activities midway Later, I went to the Mocha and Ridonk Workshop, which was absolutely amazing. I was super excited to check out the dance scene at MIT and the workshop confirmed that I have a lot to look forward to in fall!! the CPW closing show The sleep deprivation really kicked in after the Closing Show. I left Poker Night early to sleep but instead found myself slumped in a corner of C3 having a very healthy dinner of brownies and Oreos at Fondue Night (yikes). I felt gross and tired and decided to go to bed at 10:30, but after changing into pajamas and taking out my contacts, I checked my phone and saw that my friends were about to go party hoppingso I put my contacts back in, y e e t e d myself into my thigh high boots from hell and RAN to Maseeh to meet up with everyone. Was it worth it? tbh, yes. After checking out the parties, we went to the lounge on Conner 5 and spent the next three-ish hours playing Sporcle and Contact. I passed out face down on a beanbag for an hour and then walked to the Harvard Bridge to see the sunrisebut rip, it was cloudy :( Still pretty, though! cloudy sunrise over the charles Highlights: All the dancing! Rope swinging to Electric Love by BØRNS in East Campus 3 thicc squirrels Saturday [Nisha] By the third day in a row of waking up at the asscrack of dawn to light the grills, I was fairly sleep deprived, grumpy, and distressed at the fact that I hadnt done any work in the last three days. Like, seriously. Zero work. I had even skipped mandatory classes :P But thankfully, Saturday turned out to be a glorious day. It was the day of the East Campus signature event. This year, Admissions asked all the dorms to put on a signature event that best represented the culture and feel of each dorm, and we chose to throw an East Campus carnival, complete with a bounce house, a rope swing, spinning arts and juggling, and spray painting the yurt that several upperclassmen had been building since Thursday. Since I hadnt been in charge of the signature event, I took the day to chill out and ignore my responsibilities instead of running around panicking. I took the opportunity to pick up a spinning staff for the first time and play around with it for a few hours, and found that I really enjoyed it. I might continue on with it next year if I have the time. Saturday was genuinely one of the best days that Ive had in a very, very long time it was great to see all of East Campus come out and ignore their psets and responsibilities to hang out in the courtyard together. It was a gorgeous day spent surrounded by friends, and it was wonderful. Highlights:   The BOUNCE HOUSE The moment when you swing down for the first time on the rope swing The Japanese Student Union takoyaki event where I binged myself on Japanese snacks Getting a staff trick right Summary i guess?? [Ankita] CPW was a tumultuous, overwhelming, glorious, and honestly kinda surreal?? 3.14ish days. I ate sooo much unhealthy food (but walked 45 miles), met tons of wonderful and unique people, and definitely figured out which dorms are right for me ;)) I’m so grateful to all the upperclassmen (especially my lovely host) for offering such great advice and helping make my experience so amazing!! If I were to do anything differently, I’d… embrace spontaneity. planning how long I’d spend at food events was a big ol’ waste of time HYDRATE. not wear uncomfortable shoes, obviously (pray for my feet) But that’s pretty much it! Removing CPW 2019 from my Bookmarks Bar feels like the end of an era :( can’t wait to be in Nisha’s shoes in a couple years! notice the drastic increase @ CPW Summary [Nisha] Overall, Id like to say my experience as a CPW Chair was positive I liked the chance to be able to represent my community and do good things for it. Unfortunately, I guess I had been expecting it to be a rewarding experience, which it wasnt really. But hearing the positive comments about East Campus from the parents and the students reminded me that somebody had to do my job, and I think I did a pretty good job of doing it. So alls well that ends well, I suppose. I was glad when Sunday afternoon swung around and all the prefrosh were finally gone, and I could settle down for a nap and a session of binge watching Season 7 of Game of Thrones in preparation for the season premiere. To finish off this post, heres a great picture of Simmons that Ankita took. And, soon to be officially truewelcome, class of 2023! Welcome to MIT, class of 23!

Possible Future of Nuclear Energy - Free Essay Example

The Future of Nuclear Energy Abstract Climate change is a threat to the entire planet. The increase in global temperature is significantly altering our planets climate, resulting in more extreme and unpredictable weather. Greenhouses gases, such as carbon dioxide, trap heat in the atmosphere and regulate our climate. These gases exist naturally, but humans add more carbon dioxide by burning fossil fuels for energy and by clearing forests. Humans have sped the climate change process by relying on fossil fuels for a long time now. It is necessary to shift the focus to more sustainable source of energy. The shift to renewables is a long-awaited transition in the history of mankind. The transition always made sense, but there are innumerable factors- economic, social and political which make this transition difficult. The renewables also have some technological concerns which make the transition difficult. One clean energy resource has been making progress slowly and steadily which could help smoothen the transition and solve the current problems faced by solar and wind, is nuclear fusion energy. The problem with this source of energy is the bad image in public, which makes it difficult to regulate it for the policy makers. This paper attempts to explore the future of nuclear energy amidst the uncert ainty of renewables and ignorance of the advantages of nuclear fusion energy. Introduction The global temperatures are rising constantly. It leads to melting of glaciers and increase in ocean water level. The world has seen more hurricanes in this decade than in past century. The intensity of the natural calamities is getting severe with each passing year. This results in endangering the species and leading them for their extinction, animals find it extremely difficult to adapt to these drastic changes. The devastation by these natural calamities has left the mankind wondering about their mistakes. A large portion of the educated masses are aware of the disaster that is waiting for the mankind if not immediate steps are taken, whereas few ignorant souls are unaware. Many scientists have given up on the positive outcome of climate change, few estimate that we have less than 40% chance to survive this disaster. It is the need for the future that global community be united under one roof and regulates strategies to fight the climate change. World treaties and Paris agreement The world has come together before multiple times to try globally. The first time a global treaty was signed was in 1987 called the Montreal Protocol, which required all nations to phase out CFCs, a chemical used in refrigerators and air conditioners that was munching through our ozone layer. It imposed hard targets for phasing out CFC and it was legally binding. Also, it took into consideration the developing countries by making special allowances for them, so that the initiative is not a hindrance for their progress. That treaty was a huge success, saving the ozone layer. This led to the world leaders to think that climate treaty on a global level could help fight the climate change. The Paris agreement is not the first climate treaty signed by the global community. It all started with the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, a treaty that split the world into developed and developing countries and the roles for the agreement was divided as per that classification. It binded the developed countries to cut their emissions and developing countries were given leeway to develop their economy. It ended being a complete disaster as the developed countries felt unfair about changing their ways whereas developing countries, grew so fast that they emitted more than what developed countries could stop. After that, in Copenhagen 2009, UN negotiators tried to craft a successor treaty to Kyoto that would require all countries, rich and poor, to make legally binding commitments. But that didnt work, either. After the failed climate treaties, it was important to decide a format which would work. we have reached at a stage where if global efforts are not taken, the planet is destroyed. The Paris Agreement central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Every country must try to help fight the climate change and make a serious commitment towards reduction of carbon emissions. The agreement, not being legally binding this time was the strength of this agreement. Every country would start by submitting an entirely voluntary pledge for how it planned to address climate change. The content would be up to each individual government, to decide what works for them economically and technologically. This allowed the nations to have an individual plan without the legal o bligations being forced on it. Since every country had different priorities, this approach also allowed countries to tailor their climate efforts to their own individual circumstances. China could focus on air pollution and India could focus on electricfying its villages with solar power. The idea is that cooperation and political persuasion can achieve what the quest for a binding treaty failed to do. Climate change and carbon emissions The levels of carbon emissions have been increasing rapidly for the past decade. The problem with CO2 is that it stays in the atmosphere for long periods of time. As a result, even if emissions stopped increasing, CO2 concentrations would continue to increase and remain elevated for hundreds of years. Moreover, if we stabilized concentrations and the composition of todays atmosphere remained steady, which would require a dramatic reduction in current greenhouse gas emissions, surface air temperatures would continue to warm. This is because the oceans, which store heat, take many decades to fully respond to higher greenhouse gas concentrations. The oceans response to higher greenhouse gas concentrations and higher temperatures will continue to impact climate over the next several decades to hundreds of years. Last year, the CO2 levels crossed the threshold of 400 ppm and it is increasing every year. The IPCC has marked that beyond 450 ppm would be a catastrophic carbon dioxide level i n the atmosphere. It is extremely important to control the rising emissions. There is on-going research on carbon capture and storage, which would help control the rising emissions. Ideal solutions for climate change There are multiple solutions to fight climate change and all of them point towards the transition to renewable energy. It is important to stop the use of fossil fuels to keep the carbon emissions in check. Fossil fuels provide substantial economic benefits, but in recent decades, a series of concerns have arisen about their environmental costs. A few developed countries have implemented policies to limit fossil fuel consumption through a mixture of taxes, fees, or regulation on carbon emissions and subsidies for energy conservation and the development of low- or no-carbon energy resources. (Covert, Greenstone, Knittel, 2016) There are multiple positive steps taken in this direction to move towards the renewable energy on a global level. California is proposing to reach 60% renewable energy by 2030; 176 countries have clean energy goals. Hawaii, Americas most oil-dependent state, has pledged to be 100% renewable by th middle of the century. There is a raging debate whether 100% renewables are realistic and feasible. Multiple studies have been made and there is on-going research for both the sides. The optimists argue that it will be more cost-effective than the current system, which largely relies on fossil fuels. The researchers say that the existing renewable energy potential and technologies coupled with storage can generate enough energy to meet the global electricity demand by 2050. The pessimists say that was important to push back against the 100 percent argument because they fear political blowback could undermine the goal of reducing emissions far enough and fast enough to keep global temperature s from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius. The term negative emissions is relatively new in the climate change debate. It has been used to describe activities that recover more carbon from the environment than the produce and dispose of it in a safe and permanent form. Without negative emissions technologies it will get progressively more difficult to stop climate change in time. Negative emissions technologies combine capture or extraction of CO2 from the environment with carbon storage. Negative emission technologies can be deployed for canceling out concurrent positive emissions, or they can be used to reduce the carbon content of the atmosphere. Of course, if the world is emitting more CO2 than it recaptures from the environment, a negative emission, even if it is not dedicated to removing a concurrent emission, will only lower the rate of increase, rather than creating a net negative emission. (Anderson Peters, 2016) There are efforts which can be taken on an individual level like energy conservation efforts at home and work. An energy efficient lifestyle can be adopted which would help save energy. Electrical equipment can be unplugged when not in use. The shift to LED lighting can help conserve energy and save money. Biking or walking to work or other walkable areas or carpooling to work can save the emissions by automobile. The need for nuclear energy The question arises from the above discussion that there is no mention of nuclear energy as an ideal solution to climate change and stop carbon emissions, then why should the world be concerned about the future of nuclear energy? Where does the need of nuclear energy arise? The priority for the planet is to stop net emissions of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide. Putting too much emphasis on wind, solar and other renewables may block off better carbon-reduction paths. After decades of investment, it is wrong to leave nuclear power off the table. Carbon emissions in Germany rose because it chose to phase out nuclear power and so burned more coal. Major electricity generation is done by coal, natural gas and petroleum- all fossil fuels. If we aim to forgo fossil fuels, how will we meet the electricity needs of the country? Nuclear may not be an ideal solution but it is carbon neutral and it meets 20% of the electricity needs of US. The reason world keeps falling back to fossi l fuels is because they are reliable, cost-effective, but they also lead to a lot of carbon emissions. Carbon emissions is something that the world cannot afford. Nuclear powers track record of providing clean and reliable electricity compares favorably with other energy sources. Wind and solar power are becoming increasingly widespread, but their intermittent and variable supply make them poorly suited for large-scale use in the absence of an affordable way to store electricity. Hydropower, meanwhile, has very limited prospects for expansion in the United States because of environmental concerns and the small number of potential sites. Concerns about climate change and air pollution, as well as growing demand for electricity, led many governments to reconsider their aversion to nuclear power, which emits little carbon dioxide and had built up an impressive safety and reliability record. Some countries reversed their phaseouts of nuclear power, some extended the lifetimes of existing reactors, and many developed plans for new ones. But the movement lost momentum, when a 9.0-magnitude earthquake and the massive tsunami it triggered devastated Japans Fukushima nuclear power plant. The event caused widespread public doubts about the safety of nuclear power to resurface. Type of nuclear energy The foundation of nuclear energy is harnessing the power of atoms. Nuclear fission takes place when a large, unstable isotope, atoms with the same number of protons but different number of neutrons, is bombarded by high-speed particles, usually neutrons. These neutrons are accelerated and then slammed into the unstable isotope, causing it to fission, or break into smaller particles. During the process, a neutron is accelerated and strikes the target nucleus, which in most of nuclear power reactors today is Uranium-235. This splits the target nucleus and breaks it down into two smaller isotopes three high-speed neutrons, and a large amount of energy. This resulting energy is then used to heat water in nuclear reactors and ultimately produces electricity. The high-speed neutrons that are ejected become projectiles that initiate other fission reactions, or chain reactions. (Duke energy, 2013) Fusion occurs when two smaller atoms collide at very high energies to merge, creating a larger, heavier atom. This is the nuclear process that powers the suns core, which in turn drives life on Earth. Fusion reactions have an energy density many times greater than nuclear fission and fusion reactions are themselves millions of times more energetic than chemical reactions. (Vaillancourt, Labriet, Loulou, Waaub, 2008) The reasons that have made fusion so difficult to achieve to date are the same ones that make it safe. The point to be noted about Nuclear Fusion plants are not like Nuclear Fission plants aka the nuclear plants we use today and it will not melt down. Let us take a magnetic confinement reactor, these reactors work by using magnetic fields to squeeze plasma in a torus (donut-shaped chamber) so that reactions can take place. If the confinement somehow failed and the magnetic fields disappeared, the plasma would simply just expand and cool and the reaction would literally just stop and nothing more would happen. There is no scare of a possible melt down even in a worst-case scenario. The only problem with Nuclear Fusion is that it is difficult to accomplish since its incredibly messy. While its relatively easy to split an atom to produce energy, fusing hydrogen nuclei is a couple of orders of magnitude more challenging. To replicate the fusion process at the core of the sun, we must reach a temperature of at least 100 million degrees Celsius. There are a few risks involved with fusion energy, but they are minor as compared to the fission energy plants. The tremendous energy gain inside the vessel is one of the largest risks of fusion, however, a lot of care has been taken in selecting materials, which will be used to fabricate the vacuum vessel and other plasma facing components to minimize the activation caused by neutrons. Another potential issue is with the storage of tritium, one of essential materials. Since it is a short-term radio-active material, permission from international regulatory body for production and storage of Tritium is essential. Technological issues Tokamak reactors use a doughnut-shaped ring to house heavy and super-heavy isotopes of hydrogen known as deuterium and tritium. The studies show that it takes 50 megawatts of heat to generate 500 megawatts of electricity in a tokamak. Over 200 experimental tokamaks have been built worldwide, but to date they have all consumed more energy than they produce. A massive international tokamak project, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), aims to turn that situation around. The ITER is designed to produce 10 times as much energy as it takes to run, becoming the first ever net energy producing fusion reactor. ITER is collaboration of more than 35 countries around the world. The ITER members are now actively fabricating and shipping components to the ITER site in France for assembly. It is currently being built in the south of France, but with the first fusion experiments scheduled for 2030. MIT is also developing new technology like ITER but would give quicker results by 2022 or earlier. While tokamaks and stellarators use magnets to confine plasmas, another body of research is focusing on a different strategy to trigger fusion reactions, using high-powered lasers. There are multiple researches going on for nuclear fusion energy and it could be a reality within next 10 years. (Vaillancourt et al., 2008) Social issues The 2011 Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear plant disaster in Japan was a watershed moment for nuclear in Europe, with Italy deferring and subsequently cancelling new nuclear construction projects, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel kick-starting the countrys energy transition, of which phasing out of Germanys civil nuclear fleet is a key component. The event caused widespread public doubts about the safety of nuclear power to resurface. In the United States, an already slow approach to new nuclear plants slowed even further in the face of an unanticipated abundance of natural gas. Any reduction in nuclear generation will increase fossil fuel generation and pollution, given the low capacity factors and intermittency of solar and wind. Germany is a case in point. Its emissions have been largely unchanged since 2009 and increased in both 2015 and 2016 due to nuclear plant closures. Reports show that despite having installed 4% more solar and 11% more wind capacity, Germanys generation from the two sources decreased 3% and 2% respectively, since it wasnt as sunny or windy in 2016 as in 2015. And where France has some of the cheapest and cleanest electricity in Europe, Germany has some of the most expensive and dirtiest. At the same time, new reactors under construction in Finland and France have gone billions of dollars over budget, casting doubt on the affordability of nuclear fission power plants. Public concern about radioactive waste is also hindering nuclear power, and no country yet has a functioning system for disposing of it. In fact, the U.S. government is paying billions of dollars in damages to utility companies for failing to meet its obligations to remove spent fuel from reactor sites. This change in public perception has led to construction delays and cost overruns that have interrupted the principal nuclear states attempts to lead a nuclear revival. Businesses involved in nuclear power try to create new interests by, for example, exporting nuclear plants, fuel and related technology. These new interests mean that nuclear vendors become a new promoter of nuclear power, thus strengthening existing supporters. This allows the nuclear industry to expand and create links with other industries, and in these circumstances, the relevant government agencies are likely to continue to support nuclear power and the advancement of related technology. Majority of the public is unaware about the nuclear fusion and its benefits. A survey conducted by the students at University of Texas, Austin shows that the public opinion on nuclear energy is highly changeable and easily influenced, because most Americans do not feel well informed about the subject. Public opinion about nuclear energy reflects a tradeoff people make between perceptions of need and safety concerns.The percent of well-informed audience was only 21% and among them 54% were in favor of nuclear energy. If the percent of well-informed audience is that low, the results of the survey will be based on the opinions of people who have no idea about the facts and base their opinions on the things they hear from someone. It is important for the masses to be educated in technological progress of nuclear fusion, its advantages and risks involved so that a well-informed decision can be made. The current scenario does not affect the lives of the masses directly in the developed cou ntries, where electricity is cheap for now, they have jobs. It takes deeper awareness to realize the impending doom that the world is facing. One of the biggest challenges that we are facing is creating awareness about the available technology. Its important to create a society which is well-informed and take logical decisions based on facts. Political issues After Fukushima, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, an independent federal agency that licenses nuclear reactors, reviewed the industrys regulatory requirements, operating procedures, emergency response plans, safety design requirements, and spent-fuel management. The NRC will almost certainly implement many the resulting recommendations, and the cost of doing business with nuclear energy in the United States will inevitably go up. Those plants that are approaching the end of their initial 40-year license period, and that lack certain modern safety features, will face additional scrutiny in having their licenses extended. (Vaillancourt et al., 2008) Despite these limitations, there is a clear revival of nuclear energy in long-term projections to fill an important part of the gap between the current capacity and the future energy needs of developing countries without increasing GHG emissions. The fastest growth would be in Asia. Many countries are investing in nuclear research and development, encouraging the current or future penetration of new nuclear technologies. The ITER project seeks to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy by building the worlds largest and most advanced tokamak magnetic confinement fusion experiment. ITER is the largest scientific cooperation project ever established, bringing together 35 nations representing more than half of the worlds population and 85% of the planets gross domestic product. The contribution of the seven ITER Members is done essentially in-kindChina, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United States have each established a Domest ic Agency that contracts with the industry to manufacture machine components and installation systems. Except for the European Union, each Members contribution represents approximatively 9% of the total value of the project. As host Member, the European Union not only procures its share of components and systems; it is also responsible for delivering the 39 permanent buildings of the installation, which brings its contribution to approximately 45%. Building ITER is also a demonstration that nations, when confronted with a global challenge, can establish a completely new model for international collaboration. ITER marks both the culmination of six decades of international scientific and technological effort and the opening of a new and decisive chapter in the history of fusion research. By demonstrating the feasibility of fusion energy, ITER will answer the question that has obsessed three generations of physicists and engineers. This collaboration sets a huge milestone on internatio nal level, which is one of the longest running experiment in the wake of this global crisis. This is making a slow but steady progress. (Bigot, 2017) The road map to the future Renewables are not ready to store the energy and thats why the paper pitches the idea of using nuclear fusion to bridge the gap between the demand and supply without falling back to fossil fuels. It could be argued that nuclear fusion is also in its experimental stages, whereas renewables at least have made some headway in the technology, then how does the argument make sense. I would like to stress that even though nuclear has been in experimental stage, it is being actively pursued and is slated to make its run by 2030. The renewables on the other hand have been satisfied with its progress for now and is still evaluating the idea of PV with storage facilities. The actual implementation will take years of research before it can be a reality. The research process for nuclear fusion have been going on for some time now and its ready to test its results. With the U.S. federal budget under tremendous pressure, it is hard to imagine taxpayers funding demonstrations of a new nuclear technology. But if the United States takes a hiatus from creating new clean-energy options, be it nuclear fusion, renewable energy, advanced batteries, or carbon capture and sequestration, Americans will look back in ten years with regret. There will be fewer economically viable options for meeting the United States energy and environmental needs, and the country will be less competitive in the global technology market. Conclusion The greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere, finding ways to generate power cleanly, affordably, and reliably is becoming an even more pressing imperative. Nuclear power is not a silver bullet, but it is a partial solution that has proved workable on a large scale. Countries will need to pursue a combination of strategies to cut emissions, including reining in energy demand, replacing coal power plants with cleaner natural gas plants, and investing in new technologies such as renewable energy and carbon capture and sequestration. The governments role should be to help provide the private sector with a well-understood set of options, including nuclear power, not to prescribe a desired market share for any specific technology. (Bigot, 2017) These are not easy steps, and none of them will happen overnight. But each is needed to reduce uncertainty for the public, the energy companies, and investors. A more productive approach to developing nuclear power, and confronting the mounting risks of climate change†is long overdue. Further delay will only raise the stakes. References Albright, D., Gay, C. (1998). Taiwan: Nuclear nightmare averted. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 54(1), 54â€Å"60. [Taylor Francis Online], [Web of Science ?], [Google Scholar] https://energytransition.org/2017/08/4-reasons-nuclear-and-fossil-fuel-supporters-criticizing-100-renewable-energy-plan-are-wrong/ Anderson, K., Peters, G. (2016). The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354(6309), 182â€Å"183. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567 Bigot, B. (2017). ITER: une collaboration internationale inedite pour puiser lenergie des etoiles. Comptes Rendus Physique, 18(7â€Å"8), 367â€Å"371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2017.09.002 Covert, T., Greenstone, M., Knittel, C. R. (2016). Will We Ever Stop Using Fossil Fuels? SSRN Electronic Journal, 1â€Å"26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2720633 Vaillancourt, K., Labriet, M., Loulou, R., Waaub, J. P. (2008). The role of nuclear energy in long-term climate scenarios: An analysis with the World-TIMES model. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2296â€Å"2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.015